Newcastle United are confronting a few common cases with respect to the conduct of previous worker George Ormond, who in 2018 got a 20-year prison sentence for different instances of sexual maltreatment.
Ormond instructed a grassroots football club during the 1970s and 1980s prior to working with Newcastle’s childhood groups during the 1990s.
Newcastle Crown Court heard how he utilized his “position of force” to mishandle 18 young men and young fellows somewhere in the range of 1973 and 1998, and was indicted on 36 charges.
Newcastle have declined to remark, yet their back up plans are rejecting obligation.
They accept that Ormond’s wrongdoings were not associated with his job at Newcastle and a legitimate time span has terminated.
Cases for misuse which have occurred before the age of 18, should be given before the casualty arrives at 21.
Previous Newcastle player David Eatock, who is one of those mounting a common case, revealed to BBC Sport: “The one thing I’ve needed is for individuals at the club to hold their hands up.
“For Newcastle not to assume any liability is another failure.
“I needed to battle to get Ormond sentenced, yet I didn’t anticipate battling to get a type of possession from Newcastle. I simply need some conclusion.”
Thomas Beale, of legal counselors Bolt Burdon Kemp, added: “Newcastle have had each chance to apologize for the horrible maltreatment executed by Ormond and acknowledge duty regarding what occurred while he was at the club.
“By neglecting to acknowledge obligation and compelling the survivors to experience prosecution, the club is causing yet further misery and injury as opposed to assisting the survivors with attempting and push ahead with their lives.
“Plainly, this isn’t just about pay. It is about Newcastle tolerating duty and saying ‘sorry’ for their failings. I would truly urge the club to reevaluate their position and acknowledge obligation.”